Notice:
DUE TO COVID-19, PHONE CONSULTATIONS ARE AVAILABLE TO ALL POTENTIAL CLIENTS AND CURRENT CLIENTS THAT PREFER NOT TO MEET ONSITE. PLEASE DON’T HESITATE TO CALL US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS!

Dedicated Representation Exclusively in Family Law Entrust your case to Attorney Paul Eads.

California Code of Civil Procedure

Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.290


(a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), or by any court order, including a case management order, a deposition examination of the witness by all counsel, other than the witness' counsel of record, shall be limited to seven hours of total testimony.  The court shall allow additional time, beyond any limits imposed by this section, if needed to fairly examine the deponent or if the deponent, another person, or any other circumstance impedes or delays the examination.

(b) This section shall not apply under any of the following circumstances:

(1) If the parties have stipulated that this section will not apply to a specific deposition or to the entire proceeding.

(2) To any deposition of a witness designated as an expert pursuant to Sections 2034.210 to 2034.310 , inclusive.

(3) To any case designated as complex by the court pursuant to Rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court , unless a licensed physician attests in a declaration served on the parties that the deponent suffers from an illness or condition that raises substantial medical doubt of survival of the deponent beyond six months, in which case the deposition examination of the witness by all counsel, other than the witness' counsel of record, shall be limited to two days of no more than seven hours of total testimony each day, or 14 hours of total testimony.

(4) To any case brought by an employee or applicant for employment against an employer for acts or omissions arising out of or relating to the employment relationship.

(5) To any deposition of a person who is designated as the most qualified person to be deposed under Section 2025.230 .

(6) To any party who appeared in the action after the deposition has concluded, in which case the new party may notice another deposition subject to the requirements of this section.

(c) It is the intent of the Legislature that any exclusions made by this section shall not be construed to create any presumption or any substantive change to existing law relating to the appropriate time limit for depositions falling within the exclusion.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the existing right of any party to move for a protective order or the court's discretion to make any order that justice requires to limit a deposition in order to protect any party, deponent, or other natural person or organization from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, undue burden, or expense.

Client Testimonials

  • “His knowledge of the law is impeccable. ”

    Anbu R.

  • “I felt very comfortable with Mr. Eads in my corner going into my trial and I found that the outcome was much more than I ever expected to receive. ”

    J.L.

  • “He is fair, honest, and very knowledgeable about all aspects of law.”

    Josh L.

  • “Paul holds his clients needs as priority.”

    Lorraine F.

  • “If you want an excellent attorney with great rates, call Mr. Eads.”

    Roberto V.

  • “Thank you for your heart and professional practice.”

    Zeke L.

  • “Mr. Eads was able to help structure a settlement that allowed me to keep my business while sharing the business debts with my ex.”

    J.A.

  • “Paul is good at what he does. And that is simply family law. ”

    Thomas A.

  • “Mr. Eads was very patient with me and was able to resolve my case in a short period of time. ”

    Heather C.

  • “Paul is fair and honest and I'm glad I chose him to represent me.”

    Happy Client

  • “I was able to text and call him and he would reply rapidly.”

    Jennifer C.

  • “Paul always provided straight to the point the advice with honesty and care.”

    Sophia V.

  • “I am happy I found him and I recommend him to anyone in need of a family attorney.”

    Silvia M.

  • “Not only did Mr. Eads get my daughter returned to me, I was able to have full physical custody.”

    Paul W.

  • “He answered all my questions and gave me options and was very polite.”

    Youdiski Z.