Dedicated Representation Exclusively in Family Law Entrust your case to Attorney Paul Eads.

California Family Code

Family Code section 3041

3041


(a) Before making an order granting custody to a person or persons other than a parent, over the objection of a parent, the court shall make a finding that granting custody to a parent would be detrimental to the child and that granting custody to the nonparent is required to serve the best interest of the child.  Allegations that parental custody would be detrimental to the child, other than a statement of that ultimate fact, shall not appear in the pleadings.  The court may, in its discretion, exclude the public from the hearing on this issue.

(b) Subject to subdivision (d), a finding that parental custody would be detrimental to the child shall be supported by clear and convincing evidence.

(c) As used in this section, “detriment to the child” includes the harm of removal from a stable placement of a child with a person who has assumed, on a day-to-day basis, the role of his or her parent, fulfilling both the child's physical needs and the child's psychological needs for care and affection, and who has assumed that role for a substantial period of time.  A finding of detriment does not require any finding of unfitness of the parents.

(d) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the person to whom custody may be given is a person described in subdivision (c), this finding shall constitute a finding that the custody is in the best interest of the child and that parental custody would be detrimental to the child absent a showing by a preponderance of the evidence to the contrary.

(e) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, if the child is an Indian child, when an allegation is made that parental custody would be detrimental to the child, before making an order granting custody to a person or persons other than a parent, over the objection of a parent, the court shall apply the evidentiary standards described in subdivisions (d), (e), and (f) of Section 1912 of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) and Sections 224.6 and 361.7 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and the placement preferences and standards set out in Section 361.31 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and Section 1922 of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.).

Client Testimonials

  • “So glad I contacted him for my situation and truly believe he loves to help people fix their situation.”

    Raquel S.

  • “If you want an excellent attorney with great rates, call Mr. Eads.”

    Roberto V.

  • “Mr. Eads, you are a true master in your field and I will always be available should any of your prospective clients want to contact me as a reference.”

    Peter K.

  • “Paul is good at what he does. And that is simply family law. ”

    Thomas A.

  • “His knowledge of the law is impeccable. ”

    Anbu R.

  • “I am happy I found him and I recommend him to anyone in need of a family attorney.”

    Silvia M.

  • “He answered all my questions and gave me options and was very polite.”

    Youdiski Z.

  • “ I was barely able to make ends meet. Mr. Eads worked out a payment plan with me and reduced my arrears.”

    John H.

  • “Mr. Eads was able to help structure a settlement that allowed me to keep my business while sharing the business debts with my ex.”

    J.A.

  • “Mr Eads Esq is the best around. ”

    Chris T.

  • “Paul always provided straight to the point the advice with honesty and care.”

    Sophia V.

  • “He is fair, honest, and very knowledgeable about all aspects of law.”

    Josh L.

  • “He was very sympathetic to my cause and was very reassuring when I needed his assistance. ”

    Albert N.

  • “Not only did Mr. Eads get my daughter returned to me, I was able to have full physical custody.”

    Paul W.

  • “I was able to text and call him and he would reply rapidly.”

    Jennifer C.