Dedicated Representation Exclusively in Family Law Entrust your case to Attorney Paul Eads.

California Family Code

Family Code section 3427

CHAPTER 2. Jurisdiction [3421 - 3430]

( Chapter 2 added by Stats. 1999, Ch. 867, Sec. 3. )

3427.

(a) A court of this state that has jurisdiction under this part to make a child custody determination may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any time if it determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum. The issue of inconvenient forum may be raised upon motion of a party, the court’s own motion, or request of another court.

(b) Before determining whether it is an inconvenient forum, a court of this state shall consider whether it is appropriate for a court of another state to exercise jurisdiction. For this purpose, the court shall allow the parties to submit information and shall consider all relevant factors, including:

(1) Whether domestic violence has occurred and is likely to continue in the future and which state could best protect the parties and the child.

(2) The length of time the child has resided outside this state.

(3) The distance between the court in this state and the court in the state that would assume jurisdiction.

(4) The degree of financial hardship to the parties in litigating in one forum over the other.

(5) Any agreement of the parties as to which state should assume jurisdiction.

(6) The nature and location of the evidence required to resolve the pending litigation, including testimony of the child.

(7) The ability of the court of each state to decide the issue expeditiously and the procedures necessary to present the evidence.

(8) The familiarity of the court of each state with the facts and issues in the pending litigation.

(c) If a court of this state determines that it is an inconvenient forum and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum, it shall stay the proceedings upon condition that a child custody proceeding be promptly commenced in another designated state and may impose any other condition the court considers just and proper.

(d) A court of this state may decline to exercise its jurisdiction under this part if a child custody determination is incidental to an action for dissolution of marriage or another proceeding while still retaining jurisdiction over the dissolution of marriage or other proceeding.

Client Testimonials

  • “His knowledge and experience in family law radiates through his conversations and he made me feel comfortable.”

    Therisa H.

  • “Mr. Eads was very patient with me and was able to resolve my case in a short period of time. ”

    Heather C.

  • “Paul is fair and honest and I'm glad I chose him to represent me.”

    Happy Client

  • “I recommend him to everybody! Thank you and God Bless!”

    Cee M.

  • “Paul holds his clients needs as priority.”

    Lorraine F.

  • “Patient, Focused and Fair.”

    Mo S.

  • “He answered all my questions and gave me options and was very polite.”

    Youdiski Z.

  • “I was able to text and call him and he would reply rapidly.”

    Jennifer C.

  • “It was definitely a no hassle experience. Thank you!”

    Shannon R.

  • “You're in excellent hands when Mr. Paul Eads is in your corner!!!”

    Peggy P.

  • “I am happy I found him and I recommend him to anyone in need of a family attorney.”

    Silvia M.

  • “ I was barely able to make ends meet. Mr. Eads worked out a payment plan with me and reduced my arrears.”

    John H.

  • “Mr. Eads was able to help structure a settlement that allowed me to keep my business while sharing the business debts with my ex.”

    J.A.

  • “Mr Eads Esq is the best around. ”

    Chris T.

  • “So glad I contacted him for my situation and truly believe he loves to help people fix their situation.”

    Raquel S.