Notice:
DUE TO COVID-19, PHONE CONSULTATIONS ARE AVAILABLE TO ALL POTENTIAL CLIENTS AND CURRENT CLIENTS THAT PREFER NOT TO MEET ONSITE. PLEASE DON’T HESITATE TO CALL US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS!

Dedicated Representation Exclusively in Family Law Entrust your case to Attorney Paul Eads.

California Family Code

Family Code section 4057.5

ARTICLE 2. Statewide Uniform Guideline [4050 - 4076]

( Article 2 repealed and added by Stats. 1993, Ch. 219, Sec. 138. )

4057.5.

(a) (1) The income of the obligor parent’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner shall not be considered when determining or modifying child support, except in an extraordinary case where excluding that income would lead to extreme and severe hardship to any child subject to the child support award, in which case the court shall also consider whether including that income would lead to extreme and severe hardship to any child supported by the obligor or by the obligor’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner.

(2) The income of the obligee parent’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner shall not be considered when determining or modifying child support, except in an extraordinary case where excluding that income would lead to extreme and severe hardship to any child subject to the child support award, in which case the court shall also consider whether including that income would lead to extreme and severe hardship to any child supported by the obligee or by the obligee’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner.

(b) For purposes of this section, an extraordinary case may include a parent who voluntarily or intentionally quits work or reduces income, or who intentionally remains unemployed or underemployed and relies on a subsequent spouse’s income.

(c) If any portion of the income of either parent’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner is allowed to be considered pursuant to this section, discovery for the purposes of determining income shall be based on W2 and 1099 income tax forms, except where the court determines that application would be unjust or inappropriate.

(d) If any portion of the income of either parent’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner is allowed to be considered pursuant to this section, the court shall allow a hardship deduction based on the minimum living expenses for one or more stepchildren of the party subject to the order.

(e) The enactment of this section constitutes cause to bring an action for modification of a child support order entered prior to the operative date of this section.

Client Testimonials

  • “Mr Eads Esq is the best around. ”

    Chris T.

  • “I recommend him to everybody! Thank you and God Bless!”

    Cee M.

  • “I was able to text and call him and he would reply rapidly.”

    Jennifer C.

  • “He is fair, honest, and very knowledgeable about all aspects of law.”

    Josh L.

  • “Thank you for your heart and professional practice.”

    Zeke L.

  • “Paul is good at what he does. And that is simply family law. ”

    Thomas A.

  • “Mr. Eads was able to help structure a settlement that allowed me to keep my business while sharing the business debts with my ex.”

    J.A.

  • “Not only did Mr. Eads get my daughter returned to me, I was able to have full physical custody.”

    Paul W.

  • “Mr. Eads when to bat for me and in my opinion, hit a home run.”

    Veronica S.

  • “His knowledge of the law is impeccable. ”

    Anbu R.

  • “I am happy I found him and I recommend him to anyone in need of a family attorney.”

    Silvia M.

  • “Mr. Eads was very patient with me and was able to resolve my case in a short period of time. ”

    Heather C.

  • “Mr. Eads, you are a true master in your field and I will always be available should any of your prospective clients want to contact me as a reference.”

    Peter K.

  • “He was very sympathetic to my cause and was very reassuring when I needed his assistance. ”

    Albert N.

  • “Paul is fair and honest and I'm glad I chose him to represent me.”

    Happy Client