Dedicated Representation Exclusively in Family Law Entrust your case to Attorney Paul Eads.

California Family Code

Family Code section 4057.5

ARTICLE 2. Statewide Uniform Guideline [4050 - 4076]

( Article 2 repealed and added by Stats. 1993, Ch. 219, Sec. 138. )

4057.5.

(a) (1) The income of the obligor parent’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner shall not be considered when determining or modifying child support, except in an extraordinary case where excluding that income would lead to extreme and severe hardship to any child subject to the child support award, in which case the court shall also consider whether including that income would lead to extreme and severe hardship to any child supported by the obligor or by the obligor’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner.

(2) The income of the obligee parent’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner shall not be considered when determining or modifying child support, except in an extraordinary case where excluding that income would lead to extreme and severe hardship to any child subject to the child support award, in which case the court shall also consider whether including that income would lead to extreme and severe hardship to any child supported by the obligee or by the obligee’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner.

(b) For purposes of this section, an extraordinary case may include a parent who voluntarily or intentionally quits work or reduces income, or who intentionally remains unemployed or underemployed and relies on a subsequent spouse’s income.

(c) If any portion of the income of either parent’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner is allowed to be considered pursuant to this section, discovery for the purposes of determining income shall be based on W2 and 1099 income tax forms, except where the court determines that application would be unjust or inappropriate.

(d) If any portion of the income of either parent’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner is allowed to be considered pursuant to this section, the court shall allow a hardship deduction based on the minimum living expenses for one or more stepchildren of the party subject to the order.

(e) The enactment of this section constitutes cause to bring an action for modification of a child support order entered prior to the operative date of this section.

Client Testimonials

  • “I felt very comfortable with Mr. Eads in my corner going into my trial and I found that the outcome was much more than I ever expected to receive. ”

    J.L.

  • “Thank you for your heart and professional practice.”

    Zeke L.

  • “Mr. Eads worked hard for me and I am confident he will do the same for you.”

    K.Y.

  • “It was definitely a no hassle experience. Thank you!”

    Shannon R.

  • “Mr. Eads, you are a true master in your field and I will always be available should any of your prospective clients want to contact me as a reference.”

    Peter K.

  • “I recommend him to everybody! Thank you and God Bless!”

    Cee M.

  • “His knowledge and experience in family law radiates through his conversations and he made me feel comfortable.”

    Therisa H.

  • “Not only did Mr. Eads get my daughter returned to me, I was able to have full physical custody.”

    Paul W.

  • “Patient, Focused and Fair.”

    Mo S.

  • “You're in excellent hands when Mr. Paul Eads is in your corner!!!”

    Peggy P.

  • “I am happy I found him and I recommend him to anyone in need of a family attorney.”

    Silvia M.

  • “Paul is fair and honest and I'm glad I chose him to represent me.”

    Happy Client

  • “He was very sympathetic to my cause and was very reassuring when I needed his assistance. ”

    Albert N.

  • “Paul is good at what he does. And that is simply family law. ”

    Thomas A.

  • “Mr. Eads was very patient with me and was able to resolve my case in a short period of time. ”

    Heather C.