Notice:
DUE TO COVID-19, PHONE CONSULTATIONS ARE AVAILABLE TO ALL POTENTIAL CLIENTS AND CURRENT CLIENTS THAT PREFER NOT TO MEET ONSITE. PLEASE DON’T HESITATE TO CALL US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS!

Dedicated Representation Exclusively in Family Law Entrust your case to Attorney Paul Eads.

California Family Code

Family Code section 4057

4057

(a) The amount of child support established by the formula provided in subdivision (a) of Section 4055 is presumed to be the correct amount of child support to be ordered.

(b) The presumption of subdivision (a) is a rebuttable presumption affecting the burden of proof and may be rebutted by admissible evidence showing that application of the formula would be unjust or inappropriate in the particular case, consistent with the principles set forth in Section 4053 , because one or more of the following factors is found to be applicable by a preponderance of the evidence, and the court states in writing or on the record the information required in subdivision (a) of Section 4056 :

(1) The parties have stipulated to a different amount of child support under subdivision (a) of Section 4065 .

(2) The sale of the family residence is deferred pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 3800 ) of Part 1 and the rental value of the family residence where the children reside exceeds the mortgage payments, homeowner's insurance, and property taxes.  The amount of any adjustment pursuant to this paragraph shall not be greater than the excess amount.

(3) The parent being ordered to pay child support has an extraordinarily high income and the amount determined under the formula would exceed the needs of the children.

(4) A party is not contributing to the needs of the children at a level commensurate with that party's custodial time.

(5) Application of the formula would be unjust or inappropriate due to special circumstances in the particular case.  These special circumstances include, but are not limited to, the following:

(A) Cases in which the parents have different time-sharing arrangements for different children.

(B) Cases in which both parents have substantially equal time-sharing of the children and one parent has a much lower or higher percentage of income used for housing than the other parent.

(C) Cases in which the children have special medical or other needs that could require child support that would be greater than the formula amount.

(D) Cases in which a child is found to have more than two parents.

Client Testimonials

  • “I felt very comfortable with Mr. Eads in my corner going into my trial and I found that the outcome was much more than I ever expected to receive. ”

    J.L.

  • “Thank you for your heart and professional practice.”

    Zeke L.

  • “Paul is good at what he does. And that is simply family law. ”

    Thomas A.

  • “I was able to text and call him and he would reply rapidly.”

    Jennifer C.

  • “He is fair, honest, and very knowledgeable about all aspects of law.”

    Josh L.

  • “Mr. Eads, I am forever grateful for your top-notch service.”

    Jenna P.

  • “I recommend him to everybody! Thank you and God Bless!”

    Cee M.

  • “ I was barely able to make ends meet. Mr. Eads worked out a payment plan with me and reduced my arrears.”

    John H.

  • “Paul is fair and honest and I'm glad I chose him to represent me.”

    Happy Client

  • “Mr. Eads worked hard for me and I am confident he will do the same for you.”

    K.Y.

  • “Not only did Mr. Eads get my daughter returned to me, I was able to have full physical custody.”

    Paul W.

  • “He was very sympathetic to my cause and was very reassuring when I needed his assistance. ”

    Albert N.

  • “Mr Eads Esq is the best around. ”

    Chris T.

  • “It was definitely a no hassle experience. Thank you!”

    Shannon R.

  • “You're in excellent hands when Mr. Paul Eads is in your corner!!!”

    Peggy P.